Is it possible to avoid a secondary chamber when using HPA?
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:42 am
Hi folks! I'm new to both spud guns and spudfiles and wanted to thank you all for the wealth of information and help on this forum!
Now to the question. Is it possible to have an HPA source at 3000 psi hooked up to a regulator which down-regulates to approximately 300 psi, which is then hooked up to a QEV with a pilot valve? That would avoid the use of a secondary chamber which is fed by an HPA. Why is a chamber used in the first place instead of just having a high pressure source that is down-regulated? I feel like this would be easier when making a semi-auto design since it avoids having to refill a (relatively) low pressure chamber after every shot. What are the problems with this design that I have failed to take into consideration?
As a safety note, the question is just theoretical. My first spud gun won't be dealing with pressures as high as those posited in the question.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Now to the question. Is it possible to have an HPA source at 3000 psi hooked up to a regulator which down-regulates to approximately 300 psi, which is then hooked up to a QEV with a pilot valve? That would avoid the use of a secondary chamber which is fed by an HPA. Why is a chamber used in the first place instead of just having a high pressure source that is down-regulated? I feel like this would be easier when making a semi-auto design since it avoids having to refill a (relatively) low pressure chamber after every shot. What are the problems with this design that I have failed to take into consideration?
As a safety note, the question is just theoretical. My first spud gun won't be dealing with pressures as high as those posited in the question.
Thanks in advance for your help!