Muzzle Ball Valve
I was wondering if this idea would work:
I would put a say 1" Ball Valve on the muzzle of the 3/4" barrel, and have the gun be a coaxial, I would put a tee somewhere on the barrel outside the chamber with a tire valve so the air will go in the barrel then into the chamber, both chamber and barrel would be pressurized, the breech end will just be floating in the chamber, the ammo would be at the breech end like usual. When the barrel and chamber are charged the ammo will not move. When the Ball Valve is open the barrel will dump to the atmosphere then the chamber would dump int the barrel and push the ammo out.
The yellow parts are check valves.
I see no reason why this would not work, any suggestions would beappreciated. This design is easy to build because there is no piston or diaphraghm involved anywhere on the gun and it only has one moving part. This would also form a safety because th gun can only be loaded while the gun is not charged. I may have a few ideas on how to use the incoming air down the barrel to push the ammo to the breech then you would only have to insert the ammo past the filling point near the muzzle.
I would put a say 1" Ball Valve on the muzzle of the 3/4" barrel, and have the gun be a coaxial, I would put a tee somewhere on the barrel outside the chamber with a tire valve so the air will go in the barrel then into the chamber, both chamber and barrel would be pressurized, the breech end will just be floating in the chamber, the ammo would be at the breech end like usual. When the barrel and chamber are charged the ammo will not move. When the Ball Valve is open the barrel will dump to the atmosphere then the chamber would dump int the barrel and push the ammo out.
The yellow parts are check valves.
I see no reason why this would not work, any suggestions would beappreciated. This design is easy to build because there is no piston or diaphraghm involved anywhere on the gun and it only has one moving part. This would also form a safety because th gun can only be loaded while the gun is not charged. I may have a few ideas on how to use the incoming air down the barrel to push the ammo to the breech then you would only have to insert the ammo past the filling point near the muzzle.
- Attachments
-
- untitled.GIF (4.22 KiB) Viewed 4084 times
"There isn't a problem in the world that can't be solved by the proper application of explosives"
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: United States
hmmm.. that could be intersting. try it out and let us know how it works. shouldn't be expensive either
I've had the pipe for a while so that saves about 10 bucks. All I really need is the ball valve, an end cap, and a reducer. I'm getting together with my friend this weekend to make this. If it does'nt work, I can always turn it into a piston valve, which I really REALLY don't want to.
"There isn't a problem in the world that can't be solved by the proper application of explosives"
- boilingleadbath
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:35 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
1) The air in the barrel does NOT leave instantly, thusly decreasing the pressure difference across the spud for a pretty long time.
2) The air in the barrel has mass... mass which you have to accelerate, which decreases preformance
3) What if the ball valve isn't open by the time the spud gets there?!
2) The air in the barrel has mass... mass which you have to accelerate, which decreases preformance
3) What if the ball valve isn't open by the time the spud gets there?!
It's true, it would decrease performance quite a bit, but it would be useful in some high-pressure designs (IMO anyway).
Another downside is the fact that the muzzle is absolutely vital to accuracy. If the valve is even slightly off-axis, you will lose both velocity and accuracy.
Nice to know your cogs are still turning, though.
Another downside is the fact that the muzzle is absolutely vital to accuracy. If the valve is even slightly off-axis, you will lose both velocity and accuracy.
Nice to know your cogs are still turning, though.
First, I said the ball valve would be one or two sizes bigger than the barrel.
Second, When did I say anything about a sprinkler?
Another part of my idea was to put the ball valve somewhere closer to the breech so there is less air in the barrel, just need to make sure the ball valve is the same ID as the pipe, if not I can bore it to the right size with my Lathe. I'll do some research on pipe and valve sizes. Maybe I'll use FiveSevens version of the HK G11 loader for part of the system.
Second, When did I say anything about a sprinkler?
Another part of my idea was to put the ball valve somewhere closer to the breech so there is less air in the barrel, just need to make sure the ball valve is the same ID as the pipe, if not I can bore it to the right size with my Lathe. I'll do some research on pipe and valve sizes. Maybe I'll use FiveSevens version of the HK G11 loader for part of the system.
"There isn't a problem in the world that can't be solved by the proper application of explosives"
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 7 times
The ballvalve will not open fast enough, so the ammo will most likely catch on it.
A burst disk will work, but still not better than a conventional set-up.Only plus would be easy acces to puncture a burst disk, but whatever is puncturing the disc will be in the way of the ammo.
A burst disk will work, but still not better than a conventional set-up.Only plus would be easy acces to puncture a burst disk, but whatever is puncturing the disc will be in the way of the ammo.
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: United States
So Atlantis, how's this project going? I'm starting one soon but it will use a union burst disc. I will also make one later to the same specs just in a standard burst disc configuration. I'll test them alongside and see how they compare.
This idea still fascinates me. I really wonder how it will work.
This idea still fascinates me. I really wonder how it will work.
Not very efficient.
The pressurised air in the barrel is wasted.
Theres less of a pressure difference across the potato so slower acceleration = lower muzzle velocity.
It would also be very unreliable in firing, the ball valve would have to be perfectly aligned with the barrel for the potato to go through without catching unless you used an oversize valve.
The pressurised air in the barrel is wasted.
Theres less of a pressure difference across the potato so slower acceleration = lower muzzle velocity.
It would also be very unreliable in firing, the ball valve would have to be perfectly aligned with the barrel for the potato to go through without catching unless you used an oversize valve.
-
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: United States
Or a burst disc.
The ammo would never get stuck because I plan on using a Ball Valve bigger than the barrel, plus the fact that the ammo will be Airsoft BB's with a cotton ball behind them.
It might even perform better if the cotton ball did stick, then the air would'nt scatter the BB's once it leaves the barrel, not sure though.
It might even perform better if the cotton ball did stick, then the air would'nt scatter the BB's once it leaves the barrel, not sure though.
"There isn't a problem in the world that can't be solved by the proper application of explosives"